Howard, Since 192.168/16 is supposedly Class C, can you tell me why if I configure RIPv1 it allows me to configure "network 192.168.0.0" instead of giving me an error? I've tested it and of course it does not generate or accept any updates until you change it something like 192.168.10.0. Although it reports when you do a "sh ip prot" that it is routing for networks 192.168.0.0 and 192.168.10.0. Is this a Cisco IOS "feature"? I guess the same thing holds true with my question on the 172.16/12 Private IP. Thanks in advance for your input.
Elmer -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Howard C. Berkowitz Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 9:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: private addressing [7:49083] >Can anyone tell me..... > >172.16.0.0 - 172.31.0.0 is used for class B private addressing.. > >That means that it can use 16 class B network address > >Now, let say I wan to use 172.35.0.0 block, so is this consider a private >address or a public address ? Public. The private blocks are 10/8 172.16/12 192.168/16 Again, the sooner you stop thinking in classful terms, the easier real-world addressing becomes. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49181&t=49083 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
