ack.. don't mind me... been golfing in the hot sun and obviously fried my brain :) The final /24 provides enough room for the two 50's plus some link and loops as has already been pointed out by those more clueful than I today ;-)
At 04:02 PM 7/28/2002 +0000, Peter van Oene wrote: >This can't be done neatly without given the various subnets a bunch of >different networks. R2 and R4 take up the full /22 given r2 needs a /23 >and R4 needs a /24. > >At 02:53 PM 7/28/2002 +0000, crow wrote: > >Ahhhhhhhhhhh!! sorry: wrong numbers of hosts > > > > > >192.168.24.0/22 > > router1 (50 hosts) > > > > router2 router3 router4 > > (400 hosts) (50 hosts) (200 hosts) > > > > > > > > > >""crow"" schrieb im Newsbeitrag > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > hallo guys!! > > > > > > I am ashamed to ask you for this assistance but I despaired with my cidr > > > prob. > > > i have so many results and getting more and more confused. > > > here the task: > > > > > > 192.168.24.0/22 > > > router1 (28 hosts) > > > > > > > > > router2 router3 router4 > > > (60 hosts) (12 hosts) (12 hosts) > > > > > > router 1 is connected with 2, 3, and router4, each of the routers have a > > > number of hosts behind. > > > > > > Task: > > > Create an addressing scheme using VLSM. > > > > > > You are assigned the CIDR address 192.168.24.0/22 and must support the > > > network. You are not permitted to use ip unnumbered or nat on this > >network. > > > Create an addessing scheme that meets the requirements shown > > > > > > i know, that this is a simple question, but i have learned already 10 > >hours > > > today, but cant solve that prob. > > > but i want to solve this prob today, so plz help me. > > > > > > thx in advanced > > > andy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49962&t=49962 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
