Dave, I am sure the command 'no mls rp ip' would work in the Cat 6509. I have seem it in the Todd Lamle guide for switching. Boy, I am currently studying for S/W I got to remember stuff from the study material, unless have started aging and my memory has started to fail. Could you just check on that? I am sure there was something about disabling MLS on Cat5000 and Cat6000 series....something on 'Right way' and 'Wrong way'. Just check. You are correct in Cat5000 MLS is disabled by default and in Cat6000 it is enabled by default. Ok, you dont get I/O stat on VLAN interface but if you have Plicy Feature Card, you should be able to get a lot more information isnt it. PFC is used for billing information gathering and that means you have a lot of info which you need to decifer. Isnt it? Over to you Dave... Cisco_Maniac
""MADMAN"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Cisco_Maniac wrote: > > > > Agreed Dave. RSM and MSM are bothe blades and occupy a slot of Cat 5XXX and > > Cat 6XXX series chassis. Also the MSFC and RSFC are daughter cards as you > > rightly pointed out. I did a bit or reserch myself and came to the > > conclusion that the mother cards are basically Internal Routers and nothing > > else, running Cisco IOS and having virtual interfaces having MAC address > > from a shared global pool. They act as "Router-on-a-stick" model. > > But, the daughter cards mentioned above are like "Route-once-Switch-many" > > kind of MLS modules. They route the first time and then create a flow by > > cashing the entry in memory. This is the feature of NetFlow Feature Card > > inbuilt into RSFC and MSFC. > > Along with MSFC now Cisco also has Policy Feature Card that does much more > > in Policy and QoS. Am I correct guys? > > But guys, does this mean: - > > 1. RSFC card function = RSM card function + NSFC card function > > 2. MSFC card function = MSM card function + NSFC card function > > Are the above ideas true? I am confused, so help me!! > > Roughly I would say your correct. The RFSC and MSFC are also higher > performing and you cannot run an MSFC without the PFC. I got a call > last week from a customer who was wondering why his HSRP wasn't > working. HSRP was running between a 5500 w/RSM and a 6509 w/MSFC. When > transfering files he would not see any traffic on the MSFC VLAN > interface. The reason is that MLS is enabled by default and you can't > disable it on the 6500 so after the first packet is routed by the MSFC > all subsequent packets are switched in hardware hence no input/output > statistics on the VLAN interface. > > Dave > > > Thanks guys, > > Cisco_Maniac > > > > ""MADMAN"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > The RSM takes up a slot and is used in CAT5000's and 5500's. The RSFC > > > if I recall correctly is a daughter board on certain supII and supIII > > > G's in the 5500 chassis. The MSM also eats up a slot in the 6000, 6500 > > > chassis whereas the MSFC is a daughter board in the sup cards in the > > > 6500 line. There is a ton of info on CCO concerning these if you want > > > detailed info. > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > Cisco_Maniac wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > Can someone explain to me when should RSM, MSM, RSFC, MSFC, etc be > used? > > > > Basically does anyone know where the comparison (feature wise) on Cisco > > > site > > > > including CCO? > > > > I want to know from Switching exam point of view. > > > > Regards, > > > > Amit > > > -- > > > David Madland > > > Sr. Network Engineer > > > CCIE# 2016 > > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > 612-664-3367 > > > > > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" > -- > David Madland > Sr. Network Engineer > CCIE# 2016 > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 612-664-3367 > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=50356&t=50105 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
