I have several hundred sx and lx gbics in operation on the 6509 base here at cisco, with very few failures or issues.
Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of eo Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 10:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco 1000TX GBICs [7:50316] On Wednesday 31 July 2002 06:09 pm, Brian Zeitz wrote: > I have two them on (2) 3550-24s, the fiber ones, and they work fine. CDW > tried to say I needed just one. Don't ask! Ha ha. I think you can do 1 > GBIC if you chose copper. They seem to be working flawlessly so far. > They could have just embedded this 180$ GBICs in the switch. Lets see, > 180x2 for the Fiber GBIC, 2x 1500 for the EMI upgrade.... Hello :) 3500$ > later, I can use the switches ;) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ken Diliberto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:55 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Cisco 1000TX GBICs [7:50316] > > Anyone have experience with the 1000TX GBICs from Cisco? We have used > the stacking GBICs and have nothing good to say about them. The TX > GBICs are over $100 less (retail). > > Ken > Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] We use quite a few Gigastacks, LX SX and and copper and have used them for quite some time on a cat 6509 and cat 3524xl's they have worked very well for us. They certainly aren't the choke point in our network. D -- David Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]/http://www.eosin.org Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=50501&t=50316 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]