Not understanding or actually   having read about Mobile IP, but I'm going
to ask about your Windows 2000 Machine

Is Your windows 2000 machine configured with a static or dynamic address?

If it is configured with a dynamic address and is booted up on a network
that does not have a DHCP server or access to a DHCP server, the Windows
2000 client will thumbsuck an IP address from the some range that Microsoft
has coded into their operating system. Just thinking that this could be your
problem?

-----Original Message-----
From: robert 2140 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 29 August 2002 10:57 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mobile IP not responding...help! [7:52215]


Hi,
Here is the config of Router A and Rotuer B trying to do mobile IP between
them. I am running (C2500-JS-L), Version 12.2 on my 2501s. HostA here is a
Windows 2000 Professional client which is not responding to the mobile IP
advertisements.

 R1-----------------R2
  |                  |    
  |                  |
 HostA          HostA on visit


Host A is the roaming host. R1 is the Home Agent. HostA moves to the Foreign
Agent R2 network.

Router1 (Home Agent)
ip mobile home-agent
ip mobile host 192.168.10.2 192.168.10.3 interface Ethernet0 router mobile
interface Ethernet0  ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0

Router2 (Foreign Agent)
router mobile
ip mobile foreign-agent care-of Ethernet0
interface Ethernet0
 ip address 172.168.10.1 255.255.0.0
 ip irdp
 ip irdp maxadvertinterval 10
 ip irdp minadvertinterval 7
 ip irdp holdtime 30
 ip mobile foreign-service

I am not getting any response from the win2K client though MobileIP Agent
advertisements are sent out on Ethernet0 of the Foreign Agent Router. I am
just wondering if I any "client software installation" needed at my win2K.

Any help much appreciated...

Thanks




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52274&t=52215
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to