On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, JohnZ wrote: > Can I use access-list to produce the same effect as prefix-list ? Any > thoughts on which is a better way to use in redistribution over other. I am > just trying to find which one I should stick with. > Thanks
> ip prefix-list test seq 5 deny 199.172.4.0/24 > ip prefix-list test seq 10 deny 199.172.6.0/24 > ip prefix-list test seq 15 deny 199.172.8.0/24 > ip prefix-list test 20 permit 0.0.0.0/0 le 32 Prefix lists can permit annoucements in a range of netmasks. For example, the following prefix-list entry will permit announcements of 192.168.1.0/24, or any prefix within that. ip prefix-list example seq 5 permit 192.168.1.0/24 le 32 I don't believe there's a way to do that using access-lists. The other major advantage is you can pull entries out of a sequence, and insert them without re-writing the entire prefix-list again. For example, 'no ip prefix-list example seq 10' will remove only sequence 10, rather than the entire prefix list. These two features however need to ba taken with a grain of salt. Firstly you may want explicit routing control rather than a blanket cover, and secondly configurations like this are usually built out of databases so you're not going to be manually inserting entries. Rgds, - I. -- Ian Henderson CCNA, CCNP Senior Network Engineer, Chime Communications Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53592&t=53582 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
