Thanks Ian, I appreciate your answer and your help. Cheers, JZ ""Ian Henderson"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, JohnZ wrote: > > > Can I use access-list to produce the same effect as prefix-list ? Any > > thoughts on which is a better way to use in redistribution over other. I am > > just trying to find which one I should stick with. > > Thanks > > > ip prefix-list test seq 5 deny 199.172.4.0/24 > > ip prefix-list test seq 10 deny 199.172.6.0/24 > > ip prefix-list test seq 15 deny 199.172.8.0/24 > > ip prefix-list test 20 permit 0.0.0.0/0 le 32 > > Prefix lists can permit annoucements in a range of netmasks. For example, > the following prefix-list entry will permit announcements of > 192.168.1.0/24, or any prefix within that. > > ip prefix-list example seq 5 permit 192.168.1.0/24 le 32 > > I don't believe there's a way to do that using access-lists. > > The other major advantage is you can pull entries out of a sequence, and > insert them without re-writing the entire prefix-list again. For example, > 'no ip prefix-list example seq 10' will remove only sequence 10, rather > than the entire prefix list. > > These two features however need to ba taken with a grain of salt. Firstly > you may want explicit routing control rather than a blanket cover, and > secondly configurations like this are usually built out of databases so > you're not going to be manually inserting entries. > > Rgds, > > > > > - I. > > -- > Ian Henderson CCNA, CCNP > Senior Network Engineer, Chime Communications
Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53593&t=53582 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
