""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Man, I certainly wouldln't want to troubleshoot a problem on a router with > 800 extended IP access lists! I would suggest a redesign. :-)
CL: certainly goes a long way towards explaining the attitudes of your ISP service desk ;-> > > Priscilla > > Chuck's Long Road wrote: > > > > ""B.J. Wilson"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Hey Spongebob fans - > > > > > > I've noticed a couple of "new" access-list ranges > > (1300-1999 and > > > > CL: works precisely the same way as access-lists 1-99 > > > > > > > 2000-2699), which may not be all that "new," but they're ones > > I've never > > > > CL: works precisely the same way as access-list 100-199 > > > > > > > encountered before. After a cursory search on CCO, I can't > > find any > > > documentation that really explains what they really do. > > > > > > CL: Router_7(config)#access-list ? > > 1-99 IP standard access list > > 100-199 IP extended access list > > 1300-1999 IP standard access list (expanded range) > > 2000-2699 IP extended access list (expanded range) > > ( a few omitted ) > > > > CL: there are cases, particularly in complex enterprises and > > service > > prover environments, where more access-lists are required for > > various > > reasons. QoS, VPN, NAT, various security settings, customer > > requirements or > > committments, etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone have any > > > insight? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53885&t=53859 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
