After further investigation, I believe I have found the answer. However, I would like to run it by you all. The routers in question did not have the command redistribut static configured on them. If I understand the meaning of this command, it is used to inject the static routes configured on a router for redistribution into the routing protocol in question; in this case EIGRP. Sound right? Thanks.
""Robert Edmonds"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I noticed today that between several of my routers, routes that were > statically assigned did not get sent in the routing updates to neighboring > routers running EIGRP. So, I removed the static routes on several of them > to one subnet in particular, and when the router closest to the subnet in > question learned the route from the router on that subnet, the other routers > in the network picked the route up immediately. Do static routes not get > propogated, or is there something in my configuration that is causing this > behavior? I was not aware of this behavior until today. Thanks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54182&t=54164 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
