>> 191.72.223.0 /24 (223 = 00011111) well yes just a typo :-)
and it is true in chuck's addendum. however it might give the impression to the orignal poster that this is "ok" to do all the time ;-) Mark. >-----Original Message----- >From: B.J. Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Saturday, 28 September 2002 21:53 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: SuperNetting [7:54403] > > >> 191.72.223.0 /24 (223 = 00011111) > >Whoa! 223 does not equal 00011111. 223 equals 11011111. > >JohnZ was correct in his original post, that his list of subnets can be >summarized 191.72.0.0/19, and Chuck's addendum (that he'll also be >summarizing additional subnets other than the ones he >mentioned) is also >true. > >BJ >Report misconduct >and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54418&t=54403 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
