Thanks again guys, I think I should have put all the subnets 191.72.1.0 thru 191.72.31.0 to be summarized to 191.72.0.0/19. If I am wrong let me know. ""Vicuna, Mark"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >> 191.72.223.0 /24 (223 = 00011111) > > well yes just a typo :-) > > > and it is true in chuck's addendum. however it might give the > impression to the orignal poster that this is "ok" to do all the time > ;-) > > > Mark. > >-----Original Message----- > >From: B.J. Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Saturday, 28 September 2002 21:53 > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: SuperNetting [7:54403] > > > > > >> 191.72.223.0 /24 (223 = 00011111) > > > >Whoa! 223 does not equal 00011111. 223 equals 11011111. > > > >JohnZ was correct in his original post, that his list of subnets can be > >summarized 191.72.0.0/19, and Chuck's addendum (that he'll also be > >summarizing additional subnets other than the ones he > >mentioned) is also > >true. > > > >BJ > >Report misconduct > >and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54452&t=54403 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
