Hi all.
Has 12.2 changed in that when you do an "aggregate-address" the configured
router only shows the aggregate route and not include the more-specific ( or
aggregatED ) routes? Here's what I got...
This config is "supposed" to allow me to advertise both the aggregate and
more-specific routes. But if this has changed then i'll have to think of
another solution...
Thanks.
Elmer

Stowe-2504#s
!
interface Loopback10
 ip address 192.168.192.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Loopback11
 ip address 192.168.193.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Loopback12
 ip address 192.168.194.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Loopback13
 ip address 192.168.195.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Loopback14
 ip address 192.168.196.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Loopback15
 ip address 192.168.197.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Loopback16
 ip address 192.168.198.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Loopback17
 ip address 192.168.199.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Serial0
 bandwidth 64
 ip address 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.252
!
router eigrp 100
 network 192.168.199.0
!
router bgp 100
 aggregate-address 192.168.192.0 255.255.248.0
 redistribute eigrp 100
 neighbor 192.168.1.253 remote-as 200
 neighbor 192.168.1.253 send-community
 neighbor 192.168.1.253 route-map community out
!
access-list 101 permit ip host 192.168.192.0 host 255.255.248.0
route-map community permit 10
 match ip address 101
 set community none
!
route-map community permit 20
 set community no-export
!

Stowe-2504#sh ip bgp
BGP table version is 9, local router ID is 192.168.199.1
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
internal
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete

   Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 192.168.192.0/21 0.0.0.0                            32768 i
*> 192.168.199.0    0.0.0.0                  0         32768 ?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54528&t=54528
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to