This thread brings to mind a question I've had for a while. It appears sometimes that a lot of people think ATM is difficult to understand, implement, support.
Why is it that? My ( albeit limited ) exposure to ATM from the customer side is that ATM is basically every bit as easy to set up and run on your typical WAN as frame relay. Yes there are some additional bells and whistles which can become complex as you do more complex things. And obviously, complex corporate networks might make use of a lot more ATM specific features. But in general, you set up the PVC's, configure the IP address ( or enable bridging ) and do everything else pretty much the same was as you do with frame relay. Any thoughts? Chuck -- TANSTAAFL "there ain't no such thing as a free lunch" ""M.C. van den Bovenkamp"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Daren Presbitero wrote: > > > Couldn't you bridge the VLAN's into an ATM 1483 bridged PVC, point to > > point across the WAN at both ends? > > That's how I did it when I had the need. > > Regards, > > Marco. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54898&t=54866 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
