This is something I've been wondering about also. As I understand it when
you "set ip next-hop" it forces the packet to go out a particular interface.
How about if you want the destination address changed for a particular type
of traffic so HTTP traffic goes to an HTTP server and FTP to an FTP server.
For example, if you have only one Public IP Address and if HTTP comes in you
want its destination address changed to 192.168.1.10, if FTP change its
destination address to 192.168.1.20
-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Razeshu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 4:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Route-map question (urgent) [7:54910]
I think the response for this question is:
The access list:
access-list 101 permit tcp any eq www any
!-you need to detect your incoming www traffic.
!-You can use also your network address for the first "any".
!-route map statement
route-map http_access permit 10
match ip address 101
set ip next-hop 10.10.10.141
The policy map statement need to be place on the interface
that is facing
your network not to the interface near by the host
10.10.10.141.
Regards,
Stefan
PS. I think we need to help each other not to give life
lessons.
It is a Cisco study list not the church.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55011&t=54910
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
