I still don't see any mention of payment for service.
""Mike Peterson"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Dear All, > > > > > > We do have two sites (LIC and 45). one with MSFC2 > > and 2600 and one with RSM and 2600. .These sites are connected via T-3 > and > > T-1. We would like to use the T-1 as a backup in case T-3 fails .We > want > > just only one segment (10.120.0.0/16 from 45 to go over T-1 to LIC > > segment which is 120.0.0.0 this is our Back Office services that we > need > > to have protected and insure that it is operational all the times > given a > > sudden failure on the primary link T-3). > > We want a solution to this problem by using Static Routes and > > Administrative Distance. > > > > Note: Please, be advise that the IP addresses might not be the right > > one. (Those IPs we came up with are just samples.) > > Another consideration is that we have to deal with bridging irb > > too so would you please think at anything that we are missing > but solve > > our problem. > > > > > > We want to see this scenarios from another angle and to consider another > > way of achieving our goal (we might need to use IP of Loop back > Interfaces on > > both : RSM and MSFC ,or to use IP address of VLAN 20 on one site and VLAN > 120 > > on the other site, also the use of access list too ) by using static > route > > and administrative distance. > > Also, you might want to use different IP scheme and also keep in mind > that in > > LIC site (vlan 30) the Gateway is 130.0.5.1 and 45 (vlan 120) the GW IP: > > is 10.120.9.1 and is configured in all the workstations. > > > > Any help or input it will be GREAT. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Mike P. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -------------------- > -------------------- > > 172.16.20.2/24 > 172.16.20.1/24 > > RSM > MSFC > > > -----------------------T3-------------------------- > > > > > > > -------------------- > ---------------------- > > > | > | 10.120.0.1/16 > > > | > | > > > | > | > > 120.0.0.0/16 > 10.120.0.0/16 > > | > GW:120.0.5.1 > | GW: 10.120.9.1 > > > | > | > > | 120.0.0.1/16 > | > 10.120.0.1/16 > > > ------------------------ > ------------------------- > > > > > > LIC > 39 > > > -----------------------T1---------------------- > > > 192.168.11.2/24 > 192.168.11.1/24 > > > > > -------------------------- > --------------------------- > > > > > > Here are our main configs: > > > > RSM ( is configured with 10 VLAN interfaces and two > vlans does bridging irb which are not > > Concerned in this case, also use frame relay > ) > > > > Create another subint : # int serial 1/0.145 > > Ip address > 172.16.20.2/24 > > Frame-relay > int-dlci 145 > > > > Router > eigrp 5 > > Network > 172.16.20.0 0.0.0.255 > > > > #ip route > 10.120.0.0 255.255.0.0 120.0.0.1 250 > > > > > > > > MSFC (is configured with 10 VLAN interfaces and two > vlans does bridging irb which are not > > Concerned in this case, also use frame > relay ) > > > > > > > > Create another subint #int serial 3/0/0.145 > > Ip address > 172.16.20.1/24 > > Frame-relay > int-dlci 145 > > > > Router eigrp > 5 > > Network > 172.16.20.0 0.0.0.255 > > > > #ip route > 120.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.120.0.1 250 > > > > > > > > LIC : (DOES ONLY STATIC ROUTE NO DYNAMIC ROUTE) > > > > # ip route 10.120.0.0 > 255.255.0.0 192.168.11.1 > > > > > > 45 (Does only static route and no DYNAMIC ROUTE) > > > > # ip route 120.0.0.0 > 255.255.0.0 192.168.11.2 > > > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/msword which had a > name of TOPOLOGY FOR T1 AS A BACKUP FOR T3.doc] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55303&t=55303 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
