At 6:18 PM +0000 10/11/02, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: >Nathan Chessin wrote: >> >> 1) Since when is VoIP a "bandwidth-hungry app" > >Good point. VoIP isn't usually a bandwidth hog, although I guess it could be >with tons of users all using their phones at once.
I haven't thought of a properly nuanced way to say this, but it's more that it's a low-latency connectivity hog than a bandwidth hog. > >I had a few other comments on ExecNet. I was quite impressed! I'm easily >impressed though. I once bought a used car when I wasn't in the market for a >car at all. ;-) > >I think Cisco's vision is accurate and that they have proof that it's on the >mark since they use their own technology to increase productivy and decrease >expenses. nrf should check it out. They are saying a lot of the same things >he says about technology being useful only in as far as it can help >customers achieve their business goals. Unfortunately, many customers have even more difficulty articulating their business goals than their technical goals. I've been going through some incredible frustration with a board of accountant/venture capitalists that _think_ they know how physicians actually work. The problem is that while I'm understood to be the technical architect, I also understand the medical component and they are Really Off. > >How did they do those little video people? That's very cool. I guess it's >just Windows Media Player?? > >John Chambers sure looks good. He must work out. ;-) Perhaps there is a new certification here, involving curling 3600s, the clean and jerk on a 7500, etc. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55409&t=55344 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
