Are you configuring these access-lists as packet filters only or part of QoS?
>>> "The Long and Winding Road" 10/12/02 01:42PM >>> the continuing saga of QoS configuration and testing As near as I can tell, ping testing is utterly useless as a means of testing QoS configurations. I have done any number of tests this morning. all of the following have been applied inbound on an interface: access-list 171 deny ip any any precedence critical access-list 171 permit ip any any ( all pings no matter what the tos value go through) access-list 181 permit ip any any precedence critical access-list 181 permit ip any any precedence internet access-list 181 permit ip any any precedence network ( all pings no matter what the tos value go through) access-list 191 permit icmp any any precedence critical access-list 191 permit icmp any any precedence internet access-list 191 permit icmp any any precedence network ( all pings no matter what the tos value go through) this certainly does explain why I can't rate limit or police or WRED or FRED any of the ectending ping traffic I am sending through. ah well... on to the next chapter. -- www.chuckslongroad.info like my web site? take the survey! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55471&t=55468 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
