> My question is isn't network statement "network > 192.168.3.0" required on > both routers to enable rip?
There seems to be an odd discrepancy between the configurations for RTC and RTD in part 2 of the solution. RTC: router rip network 192.168.2.0 wrote: > Hi All, > > Am doing the written study. > In Jeff routing tcp/ip book, under RIP > configruation exercise session, > there is a question: > > - RTC > ---------------------------------RTD - > (192.168.2.1/24) (192.168.3.1/24) > (192.168.3.2/24) (192.168.4.1/24) > > The question is to only use unicast between RTC > and RTD > The answer is: > > RTC: > network 192.168.2.0 > neighour 192.168.3.2 > > RTD: > network 192.168.4.0 > neighour 192.168.3.1 > > My question is isn't network statement "network > 192.168.3.0" required on > both routers to enable rip? I haven't had a lab > to test this yet. > > Can someone please give me a correct answer? > > Thanks > > Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56589&t=56588 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
