You lab exercise proves this. It means the solution in the book is wrong. Thanks
Paul The Long and Winding Road wrote: > well, I was going to do a quick and dirty lab for you, but entering the > neighbor command has been wreaking havoc on one of my routers. > > in general, what I seem to have proven is that even with the neighbor > statement configured under the RIP process, RIP announcements will not go > out an interface that has not been included in the RIP process. > > > router 3 info > ----------------- > Default version control: send version 2, receive version 2 > Automatic network summarization is not in effect > Routing for Networks: > 50.0.0.0 > snip some > Routing Information Sources: > Gateway Distance Last Update > 160.160.125.4 120 01:27:12 > Distance: (default is 120) > > router rip > version 2 > redistribute ospf 123 metric 3 > passive-interface default > no passive-interface TokenRing0 > network 50.0.0.0 > neighbor 160.160.125.4 > no auto-summary > > note that router 3 is NOT sending advertisements out the token ring > interface, even though it is instructed that a neighbor is there. > > > Router_3#ir > Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP > D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area > N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 > E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP > i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter > area > * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR > P - periodic downloaded static route > > Gateway of last resort is not set > > 50.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets > C 50.50.1.0 is directly connected, Loopback50 > 99.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets > C 99.99.99.1 is directly connected, Loopback1000 > 160.160.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 16 subnets, 6 masks > C 160.160.30.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback100 > C 160.160.31.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback101 > C 160.160.32.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback102 > C 160.160.33.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback103 > C 160.160.39.0/26 is directly connected, Loopback204 > C 160.160.64.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback500 > C 160.160.65.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback501 > C 160.160.66.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback502 > C 160.160.67.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback503 > C 160.160.68.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback504 > C 160.160.125.0/24 is directly connected, TokenRing0 > C 160.160.39.160/27 is directly connected, Loopback203 > C 160.160.39.240/29 is directly connected, Loopback201 > C 160.160.39.252/30 is directly connected, Loopback200 > C 160.160.39.208/28 is directly connected, Loopback202 > C 160.160.254.0/29 is directly connected, Serial0 > Router_3# > > not that router 3 has no rip routes, and apparently is not accepting rip > routes across this interface because it is not in the proces.s > > > note that router 4 is sending rip updates across the token ring interface > > 00:17:13: RIP: sending v2 flash update to 224.0.0.9 via TokenRing0 > (160.160.125. > 4) > 00:17:13: RIP: build flash update entries > 00:17:13: 100.0.0.0/8 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0 > > conclusion - even with the neighbor statement in place, RIP will not send > updates out the interface if that interface address is not part of the rip > process. > > any takers? > > Chuck > > -- > > www.chuckslongroad.info > > > > > ""pauldongso"" wrote in message > news:200210311321.NAA14582@;groupstudy.com... > >>Hi All, >> >>Am doing the written study. >>In Jeff routing tcp/ip book, under RIP configruation exercise session, >>there is a question: >> >> - RTC ---------------------------------RTD - >>(192.168.2.1/24) (192.168.3.1/24) (192.168.3.2/24) (192.168.4.1/24) >> >>The question is to only use unicast between RTC and RTD >>The answer is: >> >>RTC: >>network 192.168.2.0 >>neighour 192.168.3.2 >> >>RTD: >>network 192.168.4.0 >>neighour 192.168.3.1 >> >>My question is isn't network statement "network 192.168.3.0" required on >>both routers to enable rip? I haven't had a lab to test this yet. >> >>Can someone please give me a correct answer? >> >>Thanks >> >>Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56649&t=56588 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
