Can't you just do a "clear arp" on the 6509? That's a commonly-used IOS
command. I would assume it works on the 6509. Or should I say ass-u-me it
works. :-)

Priscilla

Mark Smith wrote:
> 
> I need to replace a router in a cabinet at the facility where
> my hosted servers and equipment is. My equipment is "talking"
> to the hosting facility's network via a port on a 6509 switch.
> I replaced my router and then nothing from my network could
> connect to the outside world. I waited about 2 minutes (during
> which time my entire site's down and my bosses get VERY
> nervous) and I never was able to connect from inside and my
> tester on the outside was never able to get in to me. I finally
> put router #1 back in and all was well again. I've scoured the
> configuration and #2's is identical with #1 so I don't believe
> that is the problem. I'm ass-u-me-ing that the reason for this
> is the 6509 port's ARP cache is looking for the MAC address of
> router #1 and it ain't there anymore. Would this ass-u-me-ption
> be correct or is it possibly something else I'm not
> thinking/aware of? If it is an ARP issue, is there a way that I
> can remotely force the 6509 port to reset/clear/refresh it's
> ARP cache? I'm at a Sprint facility and I'd sooner get a live
> body (that's not a first level phone answerer anyway) to talk
> to me when I'm calling Mars than trying to get one at Sprint.
> 
> Any ideas/thoughts/chastisements on missing the obvious here?
> As much as I'd like to work with Cisco gear full time, it's
> only a very small part of my current job and, consequently, due
> to my lack of familiarity with what you guys do all day every
> day, it's very likely that I'm missing something that all in
> the world except me know about.
> Thanks for any help or ideas. 
> 
> Mark
> 
> 




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56699&t=56680
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to