Eric, Reinhold, Thank you. It makes sense that if the non-DR MSFC doesn't maintain a routing table (which it apparently doesn't), the standby HSRP router would need to handle traffic for at least a brief while. Delaying the preempt on the non-DR sounds like a wise move. Or maybe not using preempt at all.
Thanks again, Scott Erick B. wrote: > > Scott, > > Normal HSRP rules would be in effect in this scenario > I would say (haven't done this yet). If the failed > unit had a higher HSRP priority and was configured to > preempt then when it came back online it would become > active HSRP router. > Reinhold Fischer wrote: > > AFAIK there is no special interaction between SRM and HSRP. > You might want to use the 'standby preempt delay ' > feature > to be sure that routing protocols have converged before the > router > is taking over hsrp active router functionality. > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/619/hsrpguide4.shtmlT > > hth > > Reinhold > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58342&t=58317 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
