Follup Question:
Barring intentional obfusication, why would anyone actually use that
wildcard mask in an access list instead of a longer more readable
alternative?
Jarett
""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> write it out in binary and study it until you understand why it is or is
not
> correct.
>
> what - you expect someone else to do the work for you? how are you going
to
> learn?
>
>
> ""Ted Marinich"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I can't see why this is the right answer.
> Does
> > anyone have a different answer to question VII -1???
> >
> > It seems as though too many other networks are able to pass through
using
> > this answer - can't be right.
> >
> > I grabed the "answer" from cisco's web via the URL found in the
Practical
> > Studies book.
> >
> > Ted
> >
> > www.Boson.com Wildcard mask checker
> >
> > IP Address: 129.24.192.0
> > Wildcard mask: 102.129.7.1
> >
> > First Octet Match(es)
> > 129
> > 131
> > 133
> > 135
> > 161
> > 163
> > 165
> > 167
> > 193
> > 195
> > 197
> > 199
> > 225
> > 227
> > 229
> > 231
> >
> > Second Octet Match(es)
> > 24- 25
> > 152- 153
> >
> > Third Octet Match(es)
> > 192- 199
> >
> > Fourth Octet Match(es)
> > 0- 1
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58687&t=58644
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
