""Ted Marinich"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > The Long and Winding Road: > > As you can see from my original post, the binary equivelents are represented > in decimal format one octet at a time. The question is - has anyone > approached this question froma a different angle to get a more realistic > answer.
CL: OK. I wrote it out in binary. > > The first octet should allow 131 and 135 only, but as you can see it allows > 14 other octets!??? CL: not knowing your source, but looking at this sentence, you want some mask that permits only 131 and 135 in the octet? OK. 131 = 1000 0011 135 = 1000 0111 CL: a mask that permits only those two numbers would be? it should be fairly obvious, at this point. > > I thank you for your response, but you didn't answer the question. > > Want to try again? CL: I think I have given enough hints that you can figure out the methodology I would use. > > Ted > > P.S. Just want to compare notes with anyone who has attempted the question > and has an explaination for their answer. Cisco Press answer is one single > ACL, but I calculate a need for three in order to deny only those IPs in the > original question an no others. > > Thanks in advance... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58733&t=58644 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
