We are using MD5 -----Original Message----- From: Greg Owens Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VPN dialup Outlook Exchange Do I need Help [7:60669]
Are u using MD5 or SHA because the higher the encryption the more over head you will have. Greg Owens -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Elijah Savage III Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VPN dialup Outlook Exchange Do I need Help [7:60669] Yes I have looked at that and the client says it is just to much work. -----Original Message----- From: cebuano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:09 AM To: Elijah Savage III Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VPN dialup Outlook Exchange Do I need Help [7:60669] Elijah, Just in case you haven't read this, here's what I found... Dec 19, 2002, 6:03am PST Not sure if you still have a problem, but... Have you tried to changing the Outlook Client so that it does NOT use the Logon Network Security? (To check this, Right click the Outlook Icon and go to properties- Select the MS Exchange server and click the properties button. Then select the Advanced tab, and set the Logon Network Security to NONE.) This will prompt the Outlook client to provide the NT domain authentication info - username; domain; password - rather than trying to take it from the OS. I had this same problem and this is what I did to resolve it. There may be a more elegant solution, but I am unaware of it. Hope this helps... [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Elijah Savage III Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 9:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VPN dialup Outlook Exchange Do I need Help [7:60669] All, I need some serious help for a serious problem. We have implemented a vpn solution with 2 3030 concentrators. All work fine except for the dialin users, everything is terribly slow I used dialin tonight and had a 50.6 connection and it was creeping along like it was 9600 baud. I was getting dns resolution problems on web pages I knew were up like CCO. I have enabled LZS compression on both concentrators. I also have users complaining that they get exchange errors like can't contact server. Here is the confusing and tricky part. Now on the other hand broadband users just couldn't be happier. I have broadband at home also and all this crap I experienced tonight on dialup none of it has shown it's ugly head on broadband, no exchange error or anything. I have looked over CCO and looks like there was a few bugs for the vpn client but supposedly fixed and I am using the latest client. Also on the Network Professional news group on CCO there are just a TON of people complaining about VPN and outlook access in some form or another with no resolution. I called TAC and opened a case and the TAC engineer said yeah he knows about the errors and that is the nature of the VPN beast and said Cisco likes to recommend to custmers implementing VPN technology that they put a OWA(outlook Web Access) server in a dmz some place because web browsing is a much better experience over VPN. I just can't accept this as an answer I am out of ideas of what to try and there has to be someone out there in this big IT world that has happy dialup users using Outlook/Exchange through vpn concentrators. I did follow the recommendations on CCO about lowering the MTU settings on the client side but that does not fix it. If anyone has seen this and have a fix please let me know it would be greatly appreciated. Out of all honesty I am looking for any experience at all just to here what the general consensus is on this, so if you have a fix or not I would like to here about your overall experience. Thank You Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60709&t=60669 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]