Thanks James ! the machine has 24 bit mask.--- On Thu 01/09, James Willard
< [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
From: James Willard [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 15:28:04 -0500Subject: RE:
Broadcast Packet [7:60738]Well first of all, how is the machine's networking
configured? If yournetwork is supposed to have a /24 netmask (255.255.255.0)
but you set itto /25 (255.255.255.128) on that one machine, that would
explain whythat machine thinks 10.0.3.127 is the correct broadcast address.
Whatnetmask does that machine have?James
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-----From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf OfAzhar
TezaSent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:12 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Broadcast Packet [7:60738]I have a small network where users have been
complaining of slowness. Idecided to run sniffer and was really confused
about a machine runningon ip address 10.0.3.10 sending a packet to a
non-existing ip addresswhich is 10.0.3.127. I understand that broadcast will
be sent to allthe hosts in the network only to existing ip addresses, but
don'tunderstand why the broadcast is going to 10.0.3.127. It doesn't
effectthe machine, butofcourse its taking the bandwidth on the ethernet
wire. Thanks,_______________________________________________Join Excite! -
http://www.excite.comThe most personalized portal on the Web!Message Posted
at:http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60738&t=60738--------------------------------------------------FAQ,
 list archives, and subscription info:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.htmlReport 
misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60742&t=60738
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to