Looks like there were alot of rip handling issues regarding 0.0.0.0/0
starting from 12.0(3)T.

CSCdm26586 was the bug.

As a FYI.. this is the debug on my end..

Jan 13 19:31:35: RIP: Update contains 2 routes
Jan 13 19:31:35: RIP: Update queued
Jan 13 19:31:35: RIP: Update sent via Serial1.1
Jan 13 19:31:45: RIP: received v2 update from x.y.128.45 on Serial1.1
Jan 13 19:31:45:      0.0.0.0/0 via 0.0.0.0 in 1 hops
Jan 13 19:31:45: RIP: Update contains 1 routes
Jan 13 19:32:03: RIP: sending v2 update to 224.0.0.9 via Serial1.1 (x.y.128.4
6)
Jan 13 19:32:03: RIP: build update entries
Jan 13 19:32:03: RIP-ERROR: route 0.0.0.0/0 not in routing table.
Jan 13 19:32:03:        x.y.0.142/32 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
Jan 13 19:32:03:        x.y.139.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0

the default was not being added, although it was received.  receiving
updates from 0.0.0.0/0, is the result from the float stat used at the time.



-----Original Message-----
From: Francisco Sedano/Inf-Pronet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 10:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: disappearing default rip update [7:60937]


Are you still receiving it? (debug ip rip...)? And are you sure you aren't 
receiving any other default route via other -better admin distance- 
routing protocol? What do you see in a debug ip routing?






"Vicuna, Mark" 
Enviado por: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
13/01/2003 09:13
Por favor, responda a "Vicuna, Mark"
 
        Para:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        cc: 
        Asunto: disappearing default rip update [7:60937]

Hi All,

Has anyone experience something similar to - the rip default not being 
shown
in the route table and the rip database that is being sent by the upstream
router?
(Upstream router being a tier 2 provider).

I have other routers hanging off the provider edge router that are 
receiving
the default route.

Been working on this for a few hours now with the lvl3 guys but we are 
both
stumped.

Both of us agreed to log a call with cisco.  But just wondering if anyone
else has seen this happen before?

It's a weird one.. most likely code specific.  No bugs showing for my
customer's affected router.. ios version being used by the provider is ios
specific to their vpn network.


Cheers,
Mark.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61085&t=60937
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to