I completed the CSS1 last year and will be going for the SAFE before the
expiration in September. I will want to take the SAFE exam as close as
possible to the expiration.

My advice is, since you have come so close, please go ahead and complete
your S! then the SAFE exam. Agreed your current job does not require those
skills. However, that give you more confidence for new openings in that
field, moreso of what use will it be to you after going this far and for
failure to move ahead, Cisco render your CSS1 null and void. It then means,
in time to come, if you pick up the interest in the Cisco Security track,
you will have to start from beginning all over again.

my 2 cents.

Regards.
Godswill




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Hanna, Keith" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 6:26 AM
Subject: RE: CSIDS - 9E0-100 [7:60920]


> Thinking about it at the minute.
> I completed CSS1 the same week Cisco announced the CCSP, so I only need to
> take the SAFE exam, but I'm not sure yet if I'll bother.
> My current position doesn't deal as much with security as I'd like
> (corporate team to do that), and if I changed positions/company, I suppose
> it would depend on what I was doing in the new one.
>
> I am tempted to 'just do it', but I tend not to be very motivated when
> there's no reward
>
> KEith
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kim Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 14 January 2003 10:38
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: CSIDS - 9E0-100 [7:60920]
>
>
> Maybe I should have asked if anyone is studying for the CCSP?  What exams
> have you accomplished and what is your next step?  I may be amungst the
> group of first participants in this set of exams (v3) and others are
waiting
> to get information concerning the exams before attempting.  *grins*
>
> Kim / Zukee




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61115&t=60920
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to