Hi Juntao, Thanx for the input, what about the existing Frame-relay networks u mean to say that they will be migrating to point-point sub-interfaces(networks). Might be more Input is required from experts here.Thanx once again.
----:) Juntao wrote: > > from what i've seen in enterprises, the trend seems to be going > towards P2P > with sub interfaces and ip unnumbered when needed, as it > implies some > trouble shooting constraints. > i'm sure u know the issues that imply when using P2M(spilt > horizon must be > disabled, if your using EIGRP the bandwith command must > reflrect the lowest > cir of the pvc's used.) > i'm sure others will comment on this > > hope the above helps > > ""Simmi Singla"" a icrit dans le > message de news: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi all, > > Generally what are mostly used in customer scenarios point to > point or > > multipoint subinterfaces while confguring frame-relay.As U > know all point > > -to point sub interface consumes lot no.of addreses all > different > > subnets,although ip unnumbered is way to avoid this(ip > unnumbered has the > > limitation of managing wan links which isp dont like) but > still what isps > > prefer to suggest thier customers point to point or > multipoint as of > > now.what is the general trend followed. > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61967&t=61948 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
