actually, what i meant to say, is the coworkers and i when we had projects that output design comes out to be either P2M or P2P on subints, we usally choose the latter. if a corp already has P2M, then i would think that whoever designed the net had enough good reasons that out weighted the benefits of P2P with subints. u know sub ints came as another resolution to the issues of P2M.
""Simmi Singla"" a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi Juntao, > Thanx for the input, > what about the existing Frame-relay networks u mean to say that they will be > migrating to point-point sub-interfaces(networks). > Might be more Input is required from experts here.Thanx once again. > > > ----:) > Juntao wrote: > > > > from what i've seen in enterprises, the trend seems to be going > > towards P2P > > with sub interfaces and ip unnumbered when needed, as it > > implies some > > trouble shooting constraints. > > i'm sure u know the issues that imply when using P2M(spilt > > horizon must be > > disabled, if your using EIGRP the bandwith command must > > reflrect the lowest > > cir of the pvc's used.) > > i'm sure others will comment on this > > > > hope the above helps > > > > ""Simmi Singla"" a icrit dans le > > message de news: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Hi all, > > > Generally what are mostly used in customer scenarios point to > > point or > > > multipoint subinterfaces while confguring frame-relay.As U > > know all point > > > -to point sub interface consumes lot no.of addreses all > > different > > > subnets,although ip unnumbered is way to avoid this(ip > > unnumbered has the > > > limitation of managing wan links which isp dont like) but > > still what isps > > > prefer to suggest thier customers point to point or > > multipoint as of > > > now.what is the general trend followed. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61973&t=61948 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
