CW2k on WIN2k or NT4 is horrible in my experiences. I had it on a dual P-III (over 1k MHZ each) w/ 1 gig of ram, and it crawled. Nothing else could run on the system and CW barely worked. Plus I know several other people in my department who had the same experience. I put it on a Ultra 3 and had no problems. The windows overhead takes up too much of what CW2k needs to breathe...
Mike _______________________________ Mike Pistone NASA - Russian Services Group Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL 35806 Ph: (256) 544-2915 Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: HulaJoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 7:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CiscoWorks on Solaris or Win2K ? [7:62226] One more thing - Is anyone running the latest version of the LMS suite on an Ultra-II ? I have a choice between an Ultra-II with dual 166Mhz, 512Mb RAM, or a Dell 2400 with Dual P-III 500Mhz and 512 MB RAM. I figured that the native port on Solaris would perform better. Any suggestions ? Thanks - Joe -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of HulaJoe Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CiscoWorks Support for Solaris Intel Builds [7:62168] Does anyone know, has anyone performed a successful install of CW2K on an Intel build of Solaris ? Mahalo! Joe "Try not to become a man of success, but rather try to become a man of value." - Albert Einstein Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62249&t=62226 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
