Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > s vermill wrote: > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > > > > > Sitting in a class. It would be very cool if someone > answered > > > this before the class got out!? :-) > > > > > > Is it really true that Kismet can sniff packets on an 802.11 > > > wireless network, even if you have the access point set up > to > > > require login/authentication. (assume the hacker doesn't > know > > a > > > login) > > > > > > From what I know about access points, the hacker would fail > to > > > associate with the access point, and hence could not see > > traffic. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Priscilla > > > > If I understand the question, I don't see why a wireless > > sniffer would need to associate to an AP. It's pulling data > > off the airways similar to a NIC in promiscuous mode on a > > hard-wired network. Unless the data is encrypted, it's > > available to any wireless sniffer. Sort of like a police > > scanner. But I sense there is more to the question... > > > > > > > > > >
Cat got your tongue? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62393&t=62376 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
