Split Horizon for EIGRP ... dont think so. !!! 

Larry Letterman wrote:
> 
> r3 sends to r2, then r2 sends back to r3..
> you sure about that...split horizon should be enabled for
> eigrp and igrp..and igrp and eigrp will work together in the
> same as number..not sure about different as #'s....
> 
> Larry Letterman
> Network Engineer
> Cisco Systems
> 
> 
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: The Long and Winding Road
>   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 11:04 PM
>   Subject: Off Topic - just screwing around and what do I see?
> [7:64449]
> 
> 
>   three routers in a circle. but that's irrelevant.
> 
>   inbound from r3-------r1--r2-----r3----->back to r1
> 
> 
>   I have IGRP between two of the routers. I have loopback on
> each of the two
>   routers -- 222.222.222.x/32
> 
>   watching the 222.222.222.0/24 subnet advertisement. R2 sends
> it to R3 and
> R3
>   sends it to R2
> 
>   ???????????????????????????
> 
>   wait a minute - since when does EIGRP automatically
> redistribute into IGRP,
>   even when the AS numbers are DIFFERENT????????
> 
>   router eigrp 200
>    passive-interface default
>    no passive-interface Serial1
>    network 199.35.1.0
>    network 222.222.222.0
>    no auto-summary
>    no eigrp log-neighbor-changes
>   !
>   router igrp 100
>    passive-interface default
>    no passive-interface Serial0
>    network 199.34.1.0
>   !
>   Router_3#sh ip route 222.222.222.0
>   Routing entry for 222.222.222.0/24, 2 known subnets
>     Attached (1 connections)
>     Variably subnetted with 2 masks
>     Redistributing via eigrp 200
>     Advertised by igrp 100
> 
>   ????????????????
> 
>   well, at least IGRP isn't in the Lab any longer......
> 
>   --
>   TANSTAAFL
>   "there ain't no such thing as a free lunch"
> 
> 


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64463&t=64454
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to