In the lab, that's when you remove the route, save your config, and reboot
the router. While it's rebooting, work on a different step that doesn't
require that router. Or you can grab a soda or answer mother nature's call
if necessary. It's all about time management. =)

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The
Long and Winding Road
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 7:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: I see Cisco still hasn't fixed that bug [7:64813]


""Henry D.""  wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Chuck, you might want to read up on classful properties of this 
> command...here's a tip:

Thanks, but I have read the documentation, and I know how it works. The
"bug" I refer to is the inability to remove what the IOS automatically puts
into the running config when you do what I have described below.

It takes a router reload before the negation command will function
correctly.

Just an observation.


>
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/tech/tk648/tk365/technologies_tech_note0
> 9186a0080094374.shtml#ipnetwork
>
>
>
> ""The Long and Winding Road""  wrote in
> message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > you know the one. you're working with subnets of a classful network.
let's
> > say 10.0.0.0. you enter the command ip default-network 10.1.1.0 and 
> > what shows up in the running config is ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 
> > 10.1.1.0.
> >
> > Then try as you might, the command no ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
10.1.1.0
> > does not work. The error message states there is no matching route. 
> > Have
> to
> > reload before you can get the command to take.
> >
> > This one has been the bane of many a poor CCIE Lab candidate. Maybe
that's
> > why Cisco leaves it in there.
> >
> > --
> > TANSTAAFL
> > "there ain't no such thing as a free lunch"




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64875&t=64813
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to