DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote:
> 
> What about htis. 

Rearrange those letters once more and it will apply. Just kidding!
Seriously, your comment doesn't make sense.

A 10-Mbps NIC must be able to accept 10 megabits worth of bits in a second
unless it's broken.

Are you trying to get at the situation where the server sends at 100 Mbps
and the client is at 10 Mbps? Think about what is between them, i.e. a
store-and-forward switch. The switch to the client will only send at 10 Mbps.

Priscilla

> The server tries to dump data to the client
> over the 10M
> pipe.  The client cannot accept it as fast as the server can
> put out.
> Having a slower line to the client in effect will cause
> degradation at the
> server.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Aiello [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 11:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: is 10baseT dead? [7:65077]
> 
> 
> Scott,
> 
>    I think you have a great point, it seems that most of the
> computer
> technologies we have today are not taken full advantage of. 
> However
> instead of taking the air out the sale's staff sales as it were
> ( no pun
> intended ).  Why not suggest upgrade from the Idf's to the
> server farm.
>   You could suggest Ether Channel to combine some of the runs
> you have
> put in ( I'm sure ) when you are upgrading your networks.  This
> way you
> have more bandwidth to the server farm and fault tolerance. WOW
> now
> that's a selling point.  Also it can be done with out raising
> up the
> costs on hardware to much.  You can get duel interface NIC's
> for your
> servers that are fairly reasonable now.  I am amazed at the
> push for
> processor speed now, I can think if very few people that NEED
> 3Ghz with
> 2Gb of RAM.  However no one NEEDS a Jaguar eigther, some people
> just
> want it and if they can afford it so be it.  Look at the
> situation this
> way at least if your going for over kill the network will
> perform well,
> that is better than underselling and then having your clients
> be upset
> because they are limited in the future.
> 
> But hay that's just my 2 cents.  Take it with a grain of salt.
> 
> = )
> 
> Steven
> 
> 




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65224&t=65077
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to