o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

RAP = Russell A. Potter

RAP: As I understand it, the idea of the ban on primary research is to avoid
     publishing as established knowledge things which might possibly be a bit
     uncertain or not 'established' fact.

Read More: 
https://lists.purdue.edu/pipermail/citizendium-l/2006-October/000579.html

Russell & All --

The Wikipedia policy of "No Original Research" (NOR) -- as it was for most
of its existence until just recently -- proscribed a Wikipedia article from
being or becoming a primary source, not of course from using primary sources.
In the case of Wikipedia, but not necessarily in the case of Citizendium, this
"vow of intellectual chastity", so to speak, is necessary on two main accounts:

1. The fact that Wikipedia editors are allowed to use pseudonyms,
   and are not otherwise vetted for their personal reliability as
   sources, even when they do use their real names, means that the
   quality of an article with regard to its grounds of verifiability --
   apart from the common sense backgrounds of general information and
   judgment -- is entirely dependent on the quality of its cited sources.

2. A more practical reason can be found in what are really some of the
   most fundamental policies of the Wikimedia Foundation, the ones that
   can't be edited by hardly anybody, to wit, the complex of fine print
   disclaimers linked at the bottom every page.  Here the first of them:

   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:General_disclaimer

   According to people who tell me that they understand the legal details --
   Disclaimer:  I don't know enough to tell whether they really do or not --
   the Wikimedia Foundation is disavowing any responsibility of publishing
   actual content, and asserting that it is only the provider of a service
   for other people -- this means you -- to do so.

As I understand the direction that Citizendium is supposedly headed in --
Disclaimer:  And what the heck do I know? -- the above conditions will
not apply to Citizendium, at least, not in the same way that they apply
to Wikipedia.

So, please, somebody who knows, correct me now if I'm wrong about that.

Jon Awbrey

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
inquiry e-lab: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
citizendium development forums: http://smf.citizendium.org
http://www.textop.org/wiki/index.php?title=User:Jon_Awbrey
wikinfo: http://wikinfo.org/wiki.php?title=User:Jon_Awbrey
wp review: http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showuser=398
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

_______________________________________________
Citizendium-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.purdue.edu/mailman/listinfo/citizendium-l

Reply via email to