1) The addition of some words to the lede, which do not improve it
2) A different formulation of the inner components of a k-tuple, changing your use of the question mark to indicate them
3) The expansion of the "types of signs" section, in a way that does not seem totally dissimilar to the rest of the text.
If all the WP articles were this close, (and were this good to start with), the editing would not be as difficult as it undoubtedly will be.
On 10/20/06, Fred Bauder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 20, 2006, at 12:54 PM, Jon Awbrey wrote:
>
> Fred,
>
> Pursuant to the Call to Arms, I have just imported the
> Wikinfo copy of the article on Charles Sanders Peirce
> to the Textop Wiki.
>
> Could you take a look at that here? -->
>
> http://www.textop.org/wiki/index.php?title=Charles_Sanders_Peirce
>
> I would especially like to know if you think that the format of the
> import notice (visible at the top of the edit window) is adequate for
> the time being, until we get formal protocols worked out.
>
> I will probably be importing most of the articles that I worked on at
> Wikipedia from the prevandalized versions that I continued to develop
> at Wikinfo.
>
> Thanks for everything,
>
> Jon Awbrey
Fine for now, but you do need to make a visible link back to both the
articles on Wikinfo and Wikipedia to satisfy GFDL. That notice is
expected at the very bottom of the page.
Fred Bauder
_______________________________________________
Citizendium-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.purdue.edu/mailman/listinfo/citizendium-l
--
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
_______________________________________________ Citizendium-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.purdue.edu/mailman/listinfo/citizendium-l
