On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 07:47, Shailabh Nagar wrote:
> Marc E. Fiuczynski wrote:
>
> > Vivek,
> >
> > Any particular reason why you renamed ckrm_listenaq.c to ckrm_laq.c?
>
> I'm guilty of that :-)
>
> The reason was to achieve consistency between the name that one needs to
> specify for shares (res=<controller name>) and the module that one needs
> to load (modprobe <controller name>)
Here's yet another microscopic nit on my part :)
I think the name listenaq suggests the functionality of the module far
better than laq. Why not just have res=listenaq and keep
ckrm_listenaq.(ko|o|h|c) ?
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
