On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 07:47, Shailabh Nagar wrote:
Marc E. Fiuczynski wrote:
Vivek,
Any particular reason why you renamed ckrm_listenaq.c to ckrm_laq.c?
I'm guilty of that :-)
The reason was to achieve consistency between the name that one needs to specify for shares (res=<controller name>) and the module that one needs to load (modprobe <controller name>)
Here's yet another microscopic nit on my part :)
I think the name listenaq suggests the functionality of the module far better than laq. Why not just have res=listenaq and keep ckrm_listenaq.(ko|o|h|c) ?
Good point. Will shift it accordingly while changing the I/O controller name.
-- Shailabh
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
