On 4/10/07, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is the first argument into all the callbacks, struct container_subsys *ss,
> necessary?
I added it to support library-like abstractions - where one subsystem
can have its container callbacks and file accesses all handled by a
library which converts to a higher-level abstraction. See the
res_group example patch to see how it can be used.
>
> > +struct container_subsys cpuset_subsys = {
> > + .name = "cpuset",
> > + .create = cpuset_create,
> > + .destroy = cpuset_destroy,
> > + .can_attach = cpuset_can_attach,
> > + .attach = cpuset_attach,
> > + .populate = cpuset_populate,
> > + .subsys_id = cpuset_subsys_id,
> > + .early_init = 1,
> > +};
>
> We seem to be missing a register call here as well ..
Registration is done at compile time in the new patch set, thanks to
the static declaration of subsystems and subsystem ids.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
