El 06/10/2008 05:44 AM, Pau Arumí Albó escribió:
El dt 10 de 06 de 2008 a les 05:38 -0300, en/na Natanael Olaiz va
escriure:
El 06/09/2008 11:08 PM, Natanael Olaiz escribió:
[...]
About the structure, I was thinking about network scalability
implementation... How to do that? making "super" or "intra" networks?
I mean, intra:
<network>
<subnetwork id="subnetwork1">
.
.
</subnetwork>
<subnetwork id="subnetwork2">
.
.
</subnetwork>
<subnetwork_connection>
<port_connection>
</port_connection>
<control_connection>
</control_connection>
.
.
</subnetwork_connection>
</network>
Or super:
<supernetwork>
<network id="network1">
</network>
<network id="network2">
</network>
.
.
</supernetwork>
If I start the implementation on NE maybe the "supernetwork" can be a
"ClamNetworkCanvas"...
Writing about this area of the project [1] and reading the original idea
on the wiki I realized that this question has no much sense... since "we
are not talking about a defined limited levels, but recursion": all are
networks....
Yeah, we should generalize the idea of "processing" and "repository" so
it works for both processings and networks. Then each individual network
becomes flat.
Makes sense?
Yes, after that I understood. :)
P
_______________________________________________
Clam-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://llistes.projectes.lafarga.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clam-devel
