El dt 10 de 06 de 2008 a les 05:38 -0300, en/na Natanael Olaiz va escriure: > El 06/09/2008 11:08 PM, Natanael Olaiz escribió: > > [...] > > About the structure, I was thinking about network scalability > > implementation... How to do that? making "super" or "intra" networks? > > I mean, intra: > > > > <network> > > > > <subnetwork id="subnetwork1"> > > . > > . > > </subnetwork> > > > > <subnetwork id="subnetwork2"> > > . > > . > > </subnetwork> > > > > <subnetwork_connection> > > <port_connection> > > </port_connection> > > <control_connection> > > </control_connection> > > . > > . > > </subnetwork_connection> > > </network> > > > > Or super: > > > > <supernetwork> > > <network id="network1"> > > </network> > > <network id="network2"> > > </network> > > . > > . > > </supernetwork> > > > > If I start the implementation on NE maybe the "supernetwork" can be a > > "ClamNetworkCanvas"... > Writing about this area of the project [1] and reading the original idea > on the wiki I realized that this question has no much sense... since "we > are not talking about a defined limited levels, but recursion": all are > networks....
Yeah, we should generalize the idea of "processing" and "repository" so it works for both processings and networks. Then each individual network becomes flat. Makes sense? P _______________________________________________ Clam-devel mailing list [email protected] https://llistes.projectes.lafarga.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clam-devel
