On 05/18/2010 03:18 PM, Brandon Perry wrote: > I agree that this would be neat as long as the current way is still > available. I don't want to have to install git or svn on the servers just to > be able to update my clam sigs.
Distributing the virus DB via git/svn wouldn't scale, I don't think David was suggesting that. > > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:13 AM, David F. Skoll > <d...@roaringpenguin.com>wrote: > >>> From: Mohammed Al-Saleh <moealsa...@gmail.com> >> >>> Is the virus database updated through a repository (for example svn or >> cvs)? >>> I would like to see how virus database changes over time. >> >> Interesting. I guess there's nothing stopping you from putting the >> database in a git repo or similar. You could do a commit each time just >> before calling freshclam. >> >> Edwin's response: >> >>> No. >> >> I found surprising, I must say... wouldn't it make sense to use git or >> similar so you could easily revert bad signature additions? :) >> >> Regards, >> >> David. >> _______________________________________________ >> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net >> > > > _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net
