On 9 July 2011 11:50, Andrey V. Martyanov <reald...@gmail.com> wrote: > My company prefer closed source strategy, there are several reasons. Yes, > ClamAV can save us from writing custom engine. Our goal is to develop > all-in-one antivirus solution (realtime scanner, update manager etc). Now > it's unreasonable to build custom anti-virus engine, signature bases, memory > scanner and all the stuff. The best solution is to attach the libclamav and > to use the native antivirus bases. But we don't want to violate the GPL > license. LGPL can save us, but it's unclear which parts of ClamAV > destributed under the LGPL license. >
The usual protocol is to approach the copyright holders and negotiate an alternative license. You'll have more luck on: https://clamsupport.sourcefire.com/ Chris _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net
