On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 12:38:37 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Even then it is better than accept-and-reject method. This way your server does not
Very true! It can reject virus right at SMTP time, AND with less CPU
But I guess this rejecting does not work that well, when virus
mail is not received directly from virus - for example in the server I
run clamav, infected mails are often relayed through ISP's mail server.
have to create and deliver rejection emails ; the relaying ISP will.
Again, as I said, this will lessen your server load.
Regards,
Fajar A. Nugraha
------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users