On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:06:40 -0600 (MDT) Charlie Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So a --max-ratio of 12 should be sufficient (right?), but isn't. Even > a--max-ratio of 93 isn't sufficient. The file isn't scanned correctly > until--max-ratio is 94 or above. I see nothing strange in that, so what's the point ? The limit is calculated on a per file basis and some files in the archive have big compression ratios, e.g. LibClamAV debug: Zip -> ACTINFO.MB, compressed: 44, normal: 4096, ratio: 91 (max: 200) clamscan with its default max-ratio value of 200 doesn't mark it as oversized archive. -- oo ..... Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (\/)\......... http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg \..........._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B //\ /\ Thu Aug 12 18:20:19 CEST 2004
pgpTTcYFIxtwM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
