As a riposte: I'm not alone in this, far from it, actually. A similar request was recently issued by virusalert.nl, a dutch organisation on virus prevention. See http://www.virusalert.nl/?show=nieuws&id=559
I attempted to use the Fish to translate, and looked at their little picture of the situation. Maybe I'm missing something, but they're not talking about not rejecting. They're talking about not bouncing (sending out non-delivery notifications in response to EVERY virus). There's a huge difference. I think you'd be hard-pressed to find a legitimate company suggesting making email unreliable.
The Fish got it right.
B.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
