On Sep 22, 2004, at 12:01 PM, Brian Bruns wrote:
Security through obsecurity... How comforting.
Misguided yet implemented by so many...
Either use the DB as the authors tell you you can use it, or don't use it at all. It is very simple to understand. How would you like it if you were the ones writing the virus defs and I did the same to you after you told me that it was against the license?
Ouch.
I thought the question was *whether* he was breaking the license and what the interpretation actually is. It's not like he was trying to steal the work of others...he was quite open in acknowledging it and sounded like he wanted to work with the ClamAV people on resolving it. There's enough other companies out there doing this *without* even extending that courtesy, as I understand it.
Unless you are the maintainer of the database with the license in question? (I honestly don't know) Who is in charge of it, the "owner"? Best bet is to have that person make the decision.
-Bart
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
