On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:38:35 -0500 (EST) in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rob Mangiafico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The lack of digital signature support is a bad thing as well, I'm > > not certain but I suspect that ClamAV may find it rather hard to > > check the integrity of virus databases that freshclam retrieves. > > And you're 3 versions behind the recommended version. > > Although I appreciate the warning about being outdated, everything > was working fine until last night, which tells me something changed > in the database, as no scripts changed on the server. We're working > on upgrading, but any other ideas as to what would cause this > suddenly would be appreciated. It may be that something in the db requires 0.83, but I do remember something being mentioned about the EICAR test signature and clamdwatch on this list, have you looked at the archives and done a search on clamdwatch? -- Brian Morrison bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
