On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 09:44 -0800, Jeremy Kitchen wrote: > On Thursday 05 January 2006 08:08, Shayne Lebrun wrote:
> > Still probably bad form, as you'd be spamming the living daylights out of > > the poor recipient. > > this is why you simply reject (5xx) the message at the gates. And then they send it to your backup spam filter, and again and again.... I much prefer to blackhole the message - 200 thanks for the spam! -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CNX, CISSP # 78281 Austin Energy [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg Key: http://austinnetworkdesign.com/pgp.key Key fingerprint = B527 F53D 0C8C D38B DCC7 901D 2F19 A13A 22E8 A76A _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
