We've been running f-prot on Imail/Windows. No problems, no users
reporting email viruses.
But the content-scanning on Imail has been really bogging the box down.
So we set up an amavis/spamassassin/ClamAV content-scanning box in
front of the Imail box, with the intention of turning off f-prot/win
in favor of clam/fbsd.
1. Internet
2. MX box (multiple)
3. amavis/spamassassin/clamav box (multiple)
4. Imail box (multiple)
When we saw spamassassin and ClamAV showing tagged spam and blocked
viruses in the maillog, we turned off f-prot on the Imail box.
A few hours later, we started getting complaints about users' desktop
AV detecting email viruses where they have never reported them to us
under f-prot. We're trying to get the details of those msgs and what
viruses they had. The f-prot-good vs clamav-bad difference was
clear and quick. But we're sure where the problem is. We have
assumed clam is a good as f-prot.
We've turned f-prot back on, to see what f-prot detects that gets past clam.
Assuming we've made some mistake in configuring clamav (rather than
clam not detecting viruses that Norton desktop detects) or some other
screw up, any suggestions?
Len
_____________________________________________________________________
http://IMGate.MEIway.com : free anti-spam gateway, runs on 1000's of sites
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
